Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive-protein-to-prealbumin ratio in hospitalized older patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein-to-prealbumin ratio (CPAR) are novel markers of inflammation. The CPAR is an indicator of inflammation and malnutrition. We evaluated NLR and CPAR in combination as indicators of disease severity and prognosis in hospitalized older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 222 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (aged > 60 years) were divided into non-severe and severe groups. The severe group was subdivided into the surviving and deceased subgroups. We retrospectively assessed the predictive power of NLR and CPAR in combination (NLR + CPAR) to determine the prognosis of hospitalized older patients with COVID-19. The NLR and CPAR were significantly higher in the severe group than in the non-severe group (P < .001). Furthermore, the NLR and CPAR were higher in the deceased subgroup than in the surviving subgroup (P < .001). Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between NLR and CPAR (P < .001, r = 0.530). NLR + CPAR showed an area under the curve of 0.827 and sensitivity of 83.9% in the severe group; the area under the curve was larger (0.925) and sensitivity was higher (87.1%) in the deceased subgroup. The receiver operating characteristic curve of NLR + CPAR was significantly different from the receiver operating characteristic curves of either biomarker alone (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the severe group with elevated NLR + CPAR had a significantly lower 90-day survival rate than patients who lacked this finding (odds ratio 7.87, P < .001). NLR + CPAR may enable early diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in hospitalized older patients with COVID-19. This may also enable the identification of high-risk older patients with COVID-19 at the time of admission.

Antimitochondrial antibody associated with liver cirrhosis in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) serves as a serological marker for diagnosing primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, the association between AMA and prognosis for PBC patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between AMA and cirrhosis in PBC patients. This retrospective study enrolled 225 PBC patients, including 127 with liver cirrhosis and 98 without cirrhosis. AMA was tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) with rat kidney as the substrate. AMA-M2 and M2-3E were detected by line immunoassay (LIA). The overall positivity rate for AMA detection in PBC patients was 80.9%. The positivity rates of IIF-AMA, AMA-M2, and M2-3E were significantly higher in patients with liver cirrhosis than in those without cirrhosis (73.2% vs. 52.0%, 74.0% vs. 51.0%, and 80.3% vs. 60.2%, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression, IIF-AMA (OR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.59-5.87), AMA-M2 (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.61-6.01), and M2-3E (OR: 3.29, 95% CI: 1.63-6.66) remained significantly associated with an increased incidence of liver cirrhosis. Moreover, in multinomial logistic regression, IIF-AMA (compensated cirrhosis, OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.49-8.44; decompensated cirrhosis, OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.32-6.18), AMA-M2 (compensated cirrhosis, OR: 4.74, 95% CI: 1.94-11.58; decompensated cirrhosis, OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.19-5.33), and M2-3E (compensated cirrhosis, OR: 4.92, 95% CI: 1.74-13.96; decompensated cirrhosis, OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.28-6.64) were all found to be associated with different stages of liver cirrhosis. AMA was found to be associated with the occurrence of liver cirrhosis in PBC patients. Additionally, AMA was also related to different stages of liver cirrhosis, including compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

Role of the chloride channel blocker in the formation of filtering tract scars after glaucoma surgery in rats.

Filtration surgery is commonly performed for glaucoma treatment to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP); however, scarring of the filtering bleb is the main cause of failure. In this study, we evaluated the effects of the chloride channel blocker 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)benzoic acid (NPPB) on scar formation in filtering blebs. A glaucoma filtering surgery model was generated using Sprague-Dawley rats, divided into the control and NPPB groups receiving injections of different NPPB concentrations. The IOP of all rats decreased 1-day post-surgery and gradually increased afterward. However, IOP in rats from the NPPB groups recovered more slowly than that of the control group rats. In addition, the area and survival times of filtering blebs in rats from the NPPB groups were substantially larger and longer than those in the control group. Twenty-eight days after surgery, the protein and mRNA expression of collagen I, fibronectin and α-smooth muscle actin in the filtering area of rats from the NPPB groups were significantly lower than that in the control group rats. Collectively, our study demonstrates that NPPB inhibits filtering bleb scar formation, maintains filtering bleb morphology and prolongs filtering bleb survival time by inhibiting the differentiation of conjunctival fibroblasts and extracellular matrix synthesis.

Diagnostic value and dynamic variance of serum antibody in coronavirus disease 2019.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of serological testing and dynamic variance of serum antibody in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study retrospectively included 43 patients with a laboratory-confirmed infection and 33 patients with a suspected infection, in whom the disease was eventually excluded. The IgM/IgG titer of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay analysis. RESULTS: Compared to molecular detection, the sensitivities of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to diagnose COVID-19 were 48.1% and 88.9%, and the specificities were 100% and 90.9%, respectively.In the COVID-19 group, the IgM-positive rate increased slightly at first and then decreased over time; in contrast, the IgG-positive rate increased to 100% and was higher than IgM at all times. The IgM-positive rate and titer were not significantly different before and after conversion to virus-negative. The IgG-positive rate was up to 90% and not significantly different before and after conversion to virus-negative. However, the median IgG titer after conversion to virus-negative was double that before, and the difference was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Viral serological testing is an effective means of diagnosis for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The positive rate and titer variance of IgG are higher than those of IgM in COVID-19.